Support Utility Meter Choice and wired phone and internet. Help prevent electromagnetic radiation syndrome.

Pennsylvanians for Safe Technology
Pennsylvanians for Safe Technology
  • Home
  • PROBLEMS
  • SOLUTIONS
  • SCIENCE
  • Physicians
  • VIdeos
  • Resource Files
  • More
    • Home
    • PROBLEMS
    • SOLUTIONS
    • SCIENCE
    • Physicians
    • VIdeos
    • Resource Files
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out


Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • PROBLEMS
  • SOLUTIONS
  • SCIENCE
  • Physicians
  • VIdeos
  • Resource Files

Account

  • My Account
  • Sign out

  • Sign In
  • My Account

Litigation Updates

Povacz et. al. vs. PECO & PUC

SUMMARY OF SMART METER CASE AND PRESENT STATUS


This case was ruled on by the PA Supreme Court, with a very unfavorable ruling for Pennsylvanians in need of an analog meter. The article we wrote on this is missing, . We will add the ruling to our litigation files and write a replacement article when we are able.
 


CHD et al v. FCC (OTARD)

We are waiting for a ruling. Please visit We are the Evidence for an update on this case: https://wearetheevidence.org/chd-v-fcc-hopeful-otard-hearing-webinar-registration/

EHT et al v FCC 08-13-2021

EHT et al v FCC 08-13-2021

A District of Columbia US Court of Appeals in the case of Environmental Health Trust et al v. FCC (Docket No. 20-1025) ruled on August 13, 2021:

  • The December 2019 decision by the FCC to retain 1996 guidelines for human exposure was "arbitrary and capricious." 
  • The FCC failed to respond to "record evidence that exposure to RF radiation at levels below the Commission's current limits may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer. "
  •  The agency demonstrated a "complete failure to respond to comments containing evidence of harm caused by RF radiation."

Read the 26 VOLUMES of Evidence of Harm

Copyright © 2025 Pennsylvanians for Safe Technology - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by